 
|
Personalised journey planning
Contribution to objectives and alleviation
of problems
|
Objective |
Travel Blending |
Travel Smart Australia |
Indimark in Germany |
TravelSmart Bristol |
TravelSmart Gloucester |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
= Weakest
possible positive contribution, |
 |
= strongest
possible positive contribution |
 |
= Weakest
possible negative contribution |
 |
= strongest
possible negative contribution |
 |
=
No contribution |
|
Contribution to alleviation of key problems |
|
Problem |
Travel BlendingŪ |
Travel SmartŪ |
Indimark |
TravelSmart Bristol |
TravelSmart Gloucester |
|
Congestion-related delay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Congestion-related unreliability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visual intrusion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of amenity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global warming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local air pollution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of green space |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damage to environmentally sensitive sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poor accessibility for those without a car and those with mobility
impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disproportionate disadvantaging of particular social or geographic
groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number, severity and risk of accidents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppression of the potential for economic activity in the area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= Weakest
possible positive contribution, |
|
= strongest
possible positive contribution |
|
= Weakest
possible negative contribution |
|
= strongest
possible negative contribution |
|
=
No contribution |
Appropriate contexts
The evidence available suggests that personalised journey planning (PJP) may be more appropriate in urban environments. However, it should be noted that it has been successful in Australian cities, which are often less dense than European cities. Thus, PJP should not be immediately discounted for an area that is not densely developed. However, more evidence on impacts in different area types is needed.
|
Appropriate area-types |
|
Area type |
Suitability |
|
City centre |
|
|
Dense inner suburb |
|
|
Medium density outer suburb |
|
|
Less dense outer suburb |
|
|
District centre |
|
|
Corridor |
|
|
Small town |
|
|
Tourist town |
|
|
= Least suitable
area type |
|
= Most suitable
area type |
Adverse side-effects
There are no significant, discernable adverse side effects.
Text edited at the Institute for Transport Studies,
University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
|
