LinksGlossaryMessagesSitemapHelp


Home

Policy Instruments

Select
Search
Filter
Intelligent transport systems
SummaryFirst principles assesmentEvidence on performancePolicy contributionComplementary instrumentsReferences

First principles assessment
Why introduce intelligent transport systems?
Demand impacts
Short and long run demand responses
Supply impacts
Financing requirements
Expected impact on key policy objectives
Expected impact on problems
Expected winners and losers
Barriers to implementation

Why introduce intelligent transport systems?
ITS are a group of innovative tools based on information and communications technologies applied in the transport sector. Reasons to implement ITS (ERTICO, 1998b):

  • ITS can give significant benefits on the efficiency, safety and environmental impacts of a city's transport system;
  • ITS can lead to cost savings for authorities, operators and users;
  • ITS measures can help give the city a modern, high tech image, and improve the quality of life for citizens;
  • ITS programme can strengthen the local economy, help business and create new jobs.
  • The followings describe briefly some of the various ITS tools available and the benefits they offer (ERTICO, 1998a).
  • Advanced traffic management tools ensure that road network capacity is used to its maximum. For example, Urban Traffic Control systems minimising delays and controlling queues, "green wave" through traffic lights for emergency service vehicles, and public transport vehicles priority over other traffic.
  • Electronic payment, access control and automatic enforcement systems are important and flexible ITS tools for managing a better distribution of traffic in overcrowded networks.
  • Electronic payment systems such as smart cards offer operators more flexible ticketing, lower administrative costs and better marketing information. Passengers save time boarding and alighting, and appreciate the cash-free travel.
  • Multi-modal information systems help travellers plan their journey before leaving home or the office. One telephone call, a quick check on the website, or even a hand-held terminal can give details of public transport services, including timetables, fares, interconnection as well as current service disruptions. With complete, up-to-the-minute information, people can choose the best way to travel.
  • Variable message signs (VMS) display current traffic information or suggest alternative routes.
  • In-vehicle electronic journey planners guide drivers along their route to any chosen destination, especially useful in an unfamiliar location. Adding real-time traffic information about current incidents, road works and special events lets drivers change routes and save time.
  • In-vehicle parking information leads drivers to the nearest available parking spaces, and can even allow them to book and pay in advance.
  • Pollution monitoring systems offer cities the opportunity to use traffic management tools to reduce the levels of pollution caused by traffic. Telling drivers about the pollution their vehicles are creating also improves public awareness of the problems.
  • ITS tools such as adaptive speed control, and camera systems for speed and traffic signal enforcement will increase safety of vulnerable road users, particularly children, elderly people and the disabled.

Demand impacts
The demand impacts of ITS depend on the types of implemented fields, but ITS can have a tremendous impact on all stages of a journey in terms of time required. The large amount of information available to ensure wise travel planning greatly reduces wasted time. Pre-trip information, for example, enables accurate planning of the most efficient and effective routes as well as appropriate selection of a public transport option through real-time itineraries. In-journey information, such as real-time traffic data and arrival/departure times, increases journey speed and decreases waiting for public transport (ERTICO).

In addition, drivers also benefit from ITS use in infrastructure, enjoying speedy (and automatic) toll payments as well as variable message signs / ramp metering that warns drivers of potential slowdowns or suggests alternate routes. Fleet operators can also use ITS to streamline delivery times thanks to tracking systems, routing systems, electronic weigh-in-motion and the digital tachograph.

Responses and situations

Response 

Reduction in road traffic

Expected in situations

Change departure time

3

Decrease in peak by providing better real-time information

Change route

5

Reduce overall where reliability of selected roads improves by providing better real-time information

Change destination

-

N/A

Reduce number of trips

-2

Where reducing journey times and better real-time information may attract car users, and may induce re-routing within the network 

Change mode

-

Some increase where reducing journey times and better real-time information may attract car users, but some decrease where priority for public transport improves reliability

Sell the car

-2

Some increase where reducing travel times and better real-time information may attract car users

Move house

-

N/A

1 = Weakest possible response, 5 = strongest possible positive response
-1 = Weakest possible negative response, -5 = strongest possible negative response
0 = No response

Short and long run demand responses

Most implications of ITS were implemented in recent years, so that it is difficult to judge their effectiveness in the long run, but expected impacts might be evaluated.

Demand responses

Responses

1st year

2–4 years

5 years

10+ years

Change departure time

-

3

3

2

2

Change route

-

5

5

4

4

Change destination

Change job location

-

-

-

-

 

Shop elsewhere

-

-

-

-

Reduce number of trips

Compress working week

-

-

-

-

 

Trip chain

-1

-1

-1

-1

 

Work from home

-2

-2

-2

-2

 

Shop from home

-2

-2

-2

-2

Change mode

Ride share

-

-

-

-

 

Public transport

-

-

1

1

 

Walk/cycle

-

-

-

-

Sell the car

-

-2

-2

-2

-2

Move house

-

-

-

-

-

1 = Weakest possible response, 5 = strongest possible positive response
-1 = Weakest possible negative response, -5 = strongest possible negative response
0 = No response

Supply impacts

There will physically be no increase in the supply of road space and public transport service by applying ITS technologies. However, reduced journey times and stop start conditions, and rerouting less traffic-congested roads may in practice increase road capacity. Public transport supporting systems such as smart cards also will generate benefits for public transport users. The scale of these impacts is still difficult to judge.

Financing requirements

Some ITS technologies need special equipment and communication networks for utilising technology effect such as non-stop payment system on a toll road network. This will require the vast initial infrastructure cost. Others also need the costs to research and develop a new technology. These estimated costs of the investment will be strongly influenced by both the technical specification and amount of equipment required. It is very difficult to define the technological specification, but the key factors affecting the volume of equipment required is as follows (Perrett and Stevens, 1996):

  • the geographic coverage required
  • the density of beacons
  • the requirement for gantries on which to mount beacons
  • the design of the centralised architecture
  • the penetration of installation of in-vehicle equipement

The following total costs have been estimated at 1994 prices for common ITS infrastructure(Perrett and Stevens, 1996).

  Capital cost     Annual operating cost
Cost of beacons     £ 500m £ 60m
Cost of gantries   £ 1,700m £ 90m
Cost of centralised architecture  £ 400m £ 200m
Cost of in-vehicle equipment    £ 1,200m £ 100m
Total implementation cost    £ 3,800m £ 450m

Expected impact on key policy objectives

ITS have potential to contribute to all of key objectives according to the own specific objective, but the scale of contribution is dependent on the types of implemented fields.

Contribution to objective

Objective

Scale of contribution

Comment

Efficiency

4

By reducing journey time, improving reliability and rerouting a less congested roads

Liveable streets

-

-

Protection of the environment

4

By reducing air pollution

Equity and social inclusion

2

By improving public transport conditions


Safety

4

By reduction in the number of road casualties

Economic growth

2

By freeing up potentially productive time currently involved in delays

Finance

-4

By investment and operating technological equipment

1 = Weakest possible positive contribution, 5 = strongest possible positive contribution
-1 = Weakest possible negative contribution -5 = strongest possible negative contribution
0 = No contribution

Expected impact on problems

Contribution to alleviation of key problems

Problem

Scale of contribution

Comment

Congestion-related delay

4

By using less congested routes for providing real-time traffic information

Congestion-related unreliability

4

By using less congested routes and knowing reliable arrival time to destination for providing real-time traffic information

Community severance

-

-

Visual intrusion

-

-

Lack of amenity

-

-

Global warming

4

By reducing stop start conditions such as electronic toll collection system or offering pollution monitoring

Local air pollution

4

By reducing stop start conditions such as electronic toll collection system or offering pollution monitoring

Noise

-

-

Reduction of green space

-

-

Damage to environmentally sensitive sites

-

-

Poor accessibility for those without a car and those with mobility impairments

3

By enhancing the reliability of public transport and improving specialist modes

Disproportionate disadvantaging of particular social or geographic groups

3

By enhancing the reliability of public transport

Number, severity and risk of accidents

3

By enhancing safety or reducing traffic accidents

Suppression of the potential for economic activity in the area

2

By improving the efficiency of the local road network and parking supply and by improving an area's image

1 = Weakest possible positive contribution, 5 = strongest possible positive contribution
-1 = Weakest possible negative contribution -5 = strongest possible negative contribution
0 = No contribution

Expected winners and losers

Each ITS instrument would generally be introduced to improve specific objectives such as efficiency, environment and safety. This will induce more winners than losers.

Winners and losers

Group

Scale of contribution

Comment

Large scale freight and commercial traffic

3

May benefit from reduced journey times and better information on routes or areas used by freight vehicles for ITS based fleet management systems.

Small businesses

3

May benefit from reduced journey times and offering a better and more efficient service.

High income car-users

4

May benefit from reduced journey times, increased safety and better information even if some ITS tools are very expensive to use.

People with a low income

3

May benefit from reduced journey times, increased safety and better information, but purchase of some ITS tools need to pay high price.

People with poor access to public transport

2

By increasing access to various transport service on the multi-modal information systems.

All existing public transport users

3

May benefit from the introduction of electronic payment systems or automatic vehicle location systems to guide the bus location.

People living adjacent to the area targeted

2

May benefit from reduced journey times, increased safety and better information, but the level of benefit is lower than ITS tools users.

People making high value, important journeys

4

Where these journeys such as emergency vehicles will have higher values of time, so that they may be selected as priority vehicles.

The average car users

3

May benefit from reduced journey times and better information by route guidance systems

1 = Weakest possible positive contribution, 5 = strongest possible positive contribution
-1 = Weakest possible negative contribution -5 = strongest possible negative contribution
0 = No contribution


Barriers to implementation

Scale of barriers

Barrier

Scale

Comment

Legal

-

There are usually no obvious legal barriers to the introduction of ITS.

Finance

-4

In many cases, the significant cost of the communication infrastructure would be borne by the application. However, ITS might lead to cost savings for authorities, operators and users in the long term.

Political

-2

There are usually few political barriers to the introduction of ITS. However, some ITS tools might be difficult to accept for users when they need to pay high user charges or buy expensive instruments to use these ITS systems.

Feasibility

-

Feasibility studies such as cost benefit analysis and financial analysis are required to introduce ITS.

-1 = minimal barrier, -5 = most significant barrier

 

 

Top of the page


Text edited at the Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT